🔗 Share this article

The new book is populated with protagonists seeking fresh starts, struggling to escape substance abuse or toxic relationships, only to find hope curdling into conflict. Kraus repeatedly invokes the phrase "fresh start", transforming it into intentionally weary through recurring use. Sentences like "He aimed to start over" and "They decided to make a fresh start" are scattered across the story. Meanwhile, the author herself seems to be making her own fresh start, as this seems a new kind of book – observational, truly literary. Yet it turns out to be filled with the recurring issues and aesthetics as past novels.

From Unplanned Author to Cult Classic

Chris Kraus was originally an visual artist who became a writer almost accidentally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, which was composed of epistles to an unresponsive love interest, transforming intimate women's literature from self-debasement into rebellion. She persisted as a writer, but the next trio of compelling and abrasive novels missed the impact and rawness that the letter form imparted to the narrative voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her position as a renegade artist who had turned into a major property owner, so there was considerable focus on real estate deals. It makes sense that she now wants to experiment with fresh narrative sources, turning outward to other people's stories, at a moment when she states that contemporary political climate makes confessional writing unnecessary.

Several Eras, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, covering multiple eras – all unable to escape their histories. There is the story of Emma and Jasper, representations of Kraus's parents, transitioning from the New York borough to a pastoral setting. There is the narrative of the author, in the persona of Catt Greene, grappling with the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her addict husband a man named Paul. Finally the story of the murder of one lost young man by another in a locality long abandoned by liberal ideals only 80 miles from Catt's cottage in rural Minnesota.

As a reader drawn to honed writing of the type Kraus tends to eschew, I was seduced by the literary tone of the opening part.

As someone who reads drawn to precise prose of the kind that the author often disregards, I was won over by the literary tone of the initial part. It exhibits a fresh level of observation that accommodates small details, like the container that the young Catt pries out of frozen water at the start of the story, helped by her adored dad. "I found an ice toy!" she exclaims; "a great plaything", he replies, "the nuanced interpretations of terms rolling around in their mouths like piece candy". The author narrates Emma's narrative with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not entirely her own."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was fated to feel let down when I hoped this new voice could continue through the novel. Kraus notes here that she resents the satisfaction audiences such as myself have derived from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to fragmentation, to the messy artistic approach she shares with her inspiration writer Kathy Acker, and the void and recurrence of her past books returns in the central part. Catt is working on refurbishing 36 run-down apartments in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while shuttling between two different states, unsuccessful in assisting Paul curb his addiction. She experiences powerlessness as Paul cycles through low-resource employment as an substance abuse counselor in a world propelled by the anger and fear that powers an electoral success. A significant portion discusses about Catt's social media ostracism on a platform, her occupation changed from "author" to "landlord" on the online encyclopedia. The author still appears to care a little too much about this. At one point she states that she's investigating the murder so that before exiting the region, "she could potentially understand something about an the nation that her online critics would not understand, would not even perceive".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the eponymous day passed by the murdered individual with the perpetrator and his friends. Kraus utilizes compelling foundational content, and details moment by moment what transpired when the victim Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but appears congenially to have passed the day in the company of her associates, loitering fixing his automobile and funding treats and narcotics, before being murdered by Brittney's boyfriend a man named Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has frequently been hospitalised for violent rage.

Fascination and Incompletion

Catt gets obsessed by the account, and I was intrigued by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards responsible documentation and reckless transgression clash in this segment. Yet I wished her to go further into her individual preoccupations here. The standout figure is the character Brittney, who becomes vivid partially because of Catt seeing herself in her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman spiraling out of control in a difficult, overlooked locality. The author informs us that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. This entire part feels curiously unresolved, to the extent that her narrative ends almost mid-par